2,796 research outputs found

    Majorana fermion description of the Kondo lattice: Variational and Path integral approach

    Full text link
    All models of interacting electrons and spins can be reformulated as theories of interacting Majorana fermions. We consider the Kondo lattice model that admits a symmetric representation in terms of Majorana fermions. In the first part of this work we study two variational states, which are natural in the Majorana formulation. At weak coupling a state in which three Majorana fermions tend to propagate together as bound objects is favored, while for strong coupling a better description is obtained by having deconfined Majorana fermions. This way of looking at the Kondo lattice offers an alternative phenomenological description of this model. In the second part of the paper we provide a detailed derivation of the discretized path integral formulation of any Majorana fermion theory. This general formulation will be useful as a starting point for further studies, such as Quantum Monte Carlo, perturbative expansions, and Renormalization Group analysis. As an example we use this path integral formalism to formulate a finite temperature variational calculation, which generalizes the ground state variational calculation of the first part. This calculation shows how the formation of three-body bound states of Majorana fermions can be handled in the path integral formalism.Comment: 12 pages, 3 figure

    Ferromagnetism in the one-dimensional Kondo lattice: mean-field approach via Majorana fermion canonical transformation

    Full text link
    Using a canonical transformation it is possible to faithfully represent the Kondo lattice model in terms of Majorana fermions. Studying this representation we discovered an exact mapping between the Kondo lattice Hamiltonian and a Hamiltonian describing three spinless fermions interacting on a lattice. We investigate the effectiveness of this three fermion representation by performing a zero temperature mean-field study of the phase diagram at different couplings and fillings for the one-dimensional case, focusing on the appearance of ferromagnetism. The solutions agree in many respects with the known numerical and analytical results. In particular, in the ferromagnetic region connected to the solution at zero electron density, we have a quantitative agreement on the value of the commensurability parameter discovered in recent DMRG (in one dimension) and DMFT (in infinite dimensions) simulations; furthermore we provide a theoretical justification for it, identifying a symmetry of the Hamiltonian. This ferromagnetic phase is stabilized by the emergence of a spin-selective Kondo insulator that is described quite conveniently by the three spinless fermions. We discovered also a different ferromagnetic phase at high filling and low couplings. This phase resembles the RKKY ferromagnetic phase existing at vanishing filling, but it incorporates much more of the Kondo effect, making it energetically more favorable than the typical spiral (spin ordered) mean field ground states. We believe that this second phase represents a prototype for the strange ferromagnetic tongue identified by numerical simulations inside the paramagnetic dome. At the end of the work we also provide a discussion of possible orders different from the ferromagnetic one. In particular at half-filling, where we obtain as ground state at high coupling the correct Kondo insulating state.Comment: 21 pages, 10 figure

    Discrete tomography: Magic numbers for NN-fold symmetry

    Full text link
    We consider the problem of distinguishing convex subsets of nn-cyclotomic model sets Λ\varLambda by (discrete parallel) X-rays in prescribed Λ\varLambda-directions. In this context, a `magic number' mΛm_{\varLambda} has the property that any two convex subsets of Λ\varLambda can be distinguished by their X-rays in any set of mΛm_{\varLambda} prescribed Λ\varLambda-directions. Recent calculations suggest that (with one exception in the case n=4n=4) the least possible magic number for nn-cyclotomic model sets might just be N+1N+1, where N=lcm(n,2)N=\operatorname{lcm}(n,2).Comment: 5 pages, 2 figures; new computer calculations based on the results of arXiv:1101.4149 and arXiv:1211.6318; presented at ICQ 12 (Cracow, Poland
    corecore